homosexuality

For years I have been Speaking against homosexuality, or “Sodomy” which is its correct name. They are not gay, they are sodomites. The word homosexual is used, as a clinically cleansing of the real title, in order to hide their practices from normal view. At last someone who knows what they are talking about beyond all doubt and argument, agrees with me. It is a choice. All perversion is complete, and because it comes as a choice, it’s psychological; and you cannot pervert part of a human mind. The individual is either perverted or they are not.
People are trained like Pavlov’s dog, to react, and believe, against all reason. You are taught that belief and faith, are invaluable, when in fact they are worthless. Reality is as it is; and no amount of belief, or faith, can change anything. You are slowly being brainwashed into “Believing” that sodomy is normal. Well if isn’t. It is as filthy as ingesting poop can be; and generates all that such practices can cause.
Belief and faith, especially blind faith, have no value as they are based on nothing. Freedom within just and reasoned limits, are of great value together with knowledge, reason, logic and provable truths. There has to be limits under the law. Don’t mix up what is actually law; and what are only statutes. Some statues are necessary just and fair, but what of those that are not. Statutes are generally classed as law to fool you. They are not law; and why should your government shadow the difference. Legal yes, but lawful, they are certainly not.
This is why we advocate, that when you vote, you strike a line through all the candidates’ names; and write underneath. “None of these”. In this way, they do not have your mandate. Permission” which is your permission, to make statues on your behalf. If you don’t vote thy will assume mandate, and carry on regardless. When you do this, you voted and such vote, has to be counted not, just set aside as “Spoiled”. Barware you the Unholy Trinity, of State Church and Bankers. They have their own interests at heart, not yours. Beware the brainwashing tactics used on T.V. Think about it. At least. Think about it.

bob crosbie.
Copied and pasted=

Gender Ideology Harms Children
March 21, 2016 – a temporary statement with references. A full statement will be published in summer 2016.
The American College of Pediatricians urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality.
1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sex development (DSDs), including but not limited to testicular feminization and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.1
2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one. No one is born with an awareness of themselves as male or female; this awareness develops over time and, like all developmental processes, may be derailed by a child’s subjective perceptions, relationships, and adverse experiences from infancy forward. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women.2,3,4
3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V).5 The psychodynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved.2,4,5
4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty- blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child.6
5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.5
6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer.7,8,9,10
7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT – affirming countries.11 What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?
8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.
Michelle A. Cretella, M.D.
President of the American College of Pediatricians
Quentin Van Meter, M.D.
Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians
Pediatric Endocrinologist
Paul McHugh, M.D.
University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School and the former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital
References:
1. Consortium on the Management of Disorders of Sex Development, “Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Disorders of Sex Development in Childhood.” Intersex Society of North America, March 25, 2006. Accessed 3/20/16 from http://www.dsdguidelines.org/files/clinical.pdf.
2. Zucker, Kenneth J. and Bradley Susan J. “Gender Identity and Psychosexual Disorders.”FOCUS: The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry. Vol. III, No. 4, Fall 2005 (598-617).
3. Whitehead, Neil W. “Is Transsexuality biologically determined?” Triple Helix (UK), Autumn 2000, p6-8. accessed 3/20/16 from http://www.mygenes.co.nz/transsexuality.htm; see also Whitehead, Neil W. “Twin Studies of Transsexuals [Reveals Discordance]” accessed 3/20/16 from http://www.mygenes.co.nz/transs_stats.htm.
4. Jeffreys, Sheila. Gender Hurts: A Feminist Analysis of the Politics of Transgenderism. Routledge, New York, 2014 (pp.1-35).
5. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Association, 2013 (451-459). See page 455 re: rates of persistence of gender dysphoria.
6. Hembree, WC, et al. Endocrine treatment of transsexual persons: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3132-3154.
7. Olson-Kennedy, J and Forcier, M. “Overview of the management of gender nonconformity in children and adolescents.” UpToDate November 4, 2015. Accessed 3.20.16 from www.uptodate.com.
8. Moore, E., Wisniewski, & Dobs, A. “Endocrine treatment of transsexual people: A review of treatment regimens, outcomes, and adverse effects.” The Journal of Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2003; 88(9), pp3467-3473.
9. FDA Drug Safety Communication issued for Testosterone products accessed 3.20.16: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm161874.htm.
10. World Health Organization Classification of Estrogen as a Class I Carcinogen: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/ageing/cocs_hrt_statement.pdf.
11. Dhejne, C, et.al. “Long-Term Follow-Up of Transsexual Persons Undergoing Sex Reassignment Surgery: Cohort Study in Sweden.” PLoS ONE, 2011; 6(2). Affiliation: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Accessed 3.20.16 from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885.

Interest for thought

Hi All
I found this very interesting and thought some of you would too.

All I can say to this is WOW, what an essay – how’s the statement “..you’re murdering history..!?”. It deserves exposure. Distribute it far and wide,
Interestingly, Chris Patten (Lord Patten of Barnes), The Chancellor of Oxford University, was on the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4 yesterday on precisely the same topic. The Daily Telegraph headline yesterday was “Oxford will not rewrite history”.
Patten commented ““Education is not indoctrination. Our history is not a blank page on which we can write our own version of what it should have been according to our contemporary views and prejudice”

Rhodes must fall ????
“Dear scrotty students,
Cecil Rhodes’s generous bequest has contributed greatly to the comfort and well being of many generations of Oxford students – a good many of them, dare we say it, better, brighter and more deserving than you.

This does not necessarily mean we approve of everything Rhodes did in his lifetime – but then we don’t have to. Cecil Rhodes died over a century ago. Autres temps, autres moeurs 2. If you don’t understand what this means – and it would not remotely surprise us if that were the case – then we really think you should ask yourself the question: “Why am I at Oxford?”

Oxford, let us remind you, is the world’s second oldest extant university. Scholars have been studying here since at least the 11th century. We’ve played a major part in the invention of Western civilisation, from the 12th century intellectual renaissance through the Enlightenment and beyond. Our alumni include William of Ockham, Roger Bacon, William Tyndale, John Donne, Sir Walter Raleigh, Erasmus, Sir Christopher Wren, William Penn, Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), Samuel Johnson, Robert Hooke, William Morris, Oscar Wilde, Emily Davison, Cardinal Newman. We’re a big deal. And most of the people privileged to come and study here are conscious of what a big deal we are. Oxford is their alma mater – their dear mother – and they respect and revere her accordingly.

And what were your ancestors doing in that period? Living in mud huts, mainly. Sure we’ll concede you the short lived Southern African civilisation of Great Zimbabwe. But let’s be brutally honest here. The contribution of the Bantu tribes to modern civilisation has been as near as damn it to zilch.

You’ll probably say that’s “racist”. But it’s what we here at Oxford prefer to call “true.” Perhaps the rules are different at other universities. In fact, we know things are different at other universities. We’ve watched with horror at what has been happening across the pond from the University of Missouri to the University of Virginia and even to revered institutions like Harvard and Yale: the “safe spaces”; the #‎blacklivesmatter; the creeping cultural relativism; the stifling political correctness; what Allan Bloom rightly called “the closing of the American mind”. At Oxford however, we will always prefer facts and free, open debate to petty grievance-mongering, identity politics and empty sloganeering. The day we cease to do so is the day we lose the right to call ourselves the world’s greatest university.

Of course, you are perfectly within your rights to squander your time at Oxford on silly, vexatious, single-issue political campaigns. (Though it does make us wonder how stringent the vetting procedure is these days for Rhodes scholarships and even more so, for Mandela Rhodes scholarships) We are well used to seeing undergraduates – or, in your case – postgraduates, making idiots of themselves. Just don’t expect us to indulge your idiocy, let alone genuflect before it. You may be black – “BME” as the grisly modern terminology has it – but we are colour blind. We have been educating gifted undergraduates from our former colonies, our Empire, our Commonwealth and beyond for many generations. We do not discriminate over sex, race, colour or creed. We do, however, discriminate according to intellect.

That means, inter alia, that when our undergrads or postgrads come up with fatuous ideas, we don’t pat them on the back, give them a red rosette and say: “Ooh, you’re black and you come from South Africa. What a clever chap you are!”1 No. We prefer to see the quality of those ideas tested in the crucible of public debate. That’s another key part of the Oxford intellectual tradition you see: you can argue any damn thing you like but you need to be able to justify it with facts and logic – otherwise your idea is worthless.

This ludicrous notion you have that a bronze statue of Cecil Rhodes should be removed from Oriel College, because it’s symbolic of “institutional racism” and “white slavery”. Well even if it is – which we dispute – so bloody what? Any undergraduate so feeble-minded that they can’t pass a bronze statue without having their “safe space” violated really does not deserve to be here. And besides, if we were to remove Rhodes’s statue on the premise that his life wasn’t blemish-free, where would we stop? As one of our alumni Dan Hannan has pointed out, Oriel’s other benefactors include two kings so awful – Edward II and Charles I – that their subjects had them killed. The college opposite – Christ Church – was built by a murderous, thieving bully who bumped off two of his wives. Thomas Jefferson kept slaves: does that invalidate the US Constitution? Winston Churchill had unenlightened views about Muslims and India: was he then the wrong man to lead Britain in the war?”

Actually, we’ll go further than that. Your Rhodes Must Fall campaign is not merely fatuous but ugly, vandalistic and dangerous. We agree with Oxford historian RW Johnson that what you are trying to do here is no different from what ISIS and the Al-Qaeda have been doing to artefacts in places like Mali and Syria. You are murdering history.

And who are you, anyway, to be lecturing Oxford University on how it should order its affairs? Your #‎rhodesmustfall campaign, we understand, originates in South Africa and was initiated by a black activist who told one of his lecturers “whites have to be killed”. One of you – Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh – is the privileged son of a rich politician and a member of a party whose slogan is “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer”; another of you, Ntokozo Qwabe, who is only in Oxford as a beneficiary of a Rhodes scholarship, has boasted about the need for “socially conscious black students” to “dominate white universities, and do so ruthlessly and decisively!”

Great. That’s just what Oxford University needs. Some cultural enrichment from the land of Winnie Mandela, burning tyre necklaces, an AIDS epidemic almost entirely the result of government indifference and ignorance, one of the world’s highest per capita murder rates, institutionalised corruption, tribal politics, anti-white racism and a collapsing economy. Please name which of the above items you think will enhance the lives of the 22,000 students studying here at Oxford.

And then please explain what it is that makes your attention grabbing campaign to remove a listed statue from an Oxford college more urgent, more deserving than the desire of probably at least 20,000 of those 22,000 students to enjoy their time here unencumbered by the irritation of spoilt, ungrateful little tossers on scholarships they clearly don’t merit using racial politics and cheap guilt-tripping to ruin the life and fabric of our beloved university.

Understand us and understand this clearly: you have everything to learn from us; we have nothing to learn from you.

Yours,
Oriel College, Oxford

Drug addiction

Watching Al-Jazeera this morning 4/2/16. They are on about addictions. Whose to blame, and who isn’t? How is it defined etc. Doctors are prescribing opiates for back pain; and all sorts of pain problems. The part that is missed: is doctors work on ten per cent knowledge; and ninety percent belief. Blind belief, in what the drug companies research tells them, is factual. But it isn’t! The drug company’s interests, start, and end, with selling drugs: so when you get hooked, they make more money. Your life is ruined, all because you got hurt working or have a problem: and they get rich from your misery. If you’re disabled: you’re a scrounger; and not to be touched, in case it’s catching. You pay insurance all your working life, for to cover you during such occasions, but you’re still a useless scrounger. Drug companies do nearly all the research; and the medical collages get funded by them; and so follow the money monkey.

We have reached a level, where we can no longer trust doctors. It’ not their fault, as all they know, is what they are taught; and when research is directed solely to make money: regardless of any harm down; then the blame lies firmly on the shoulders of the drug company’s bosses. These are Limited Liability corporations, with wealth beyond belief; and so can apparently do as they please. You pay.

Governments get funding from them, directly, or by proxy from the bankers, who hold large interests, through other limited liability companies that they also own. It’s like a pigs bed: all chopped up and screwed around. A tangled mess. So they can play legal games for years. There are about seventeen very wealthy families involved; and they call it business.

What do you call it, when people’s lives are ruined; and often lost, while they sport themselves on their huge private yachts, gained by legalised fraud; and fuelled by pure greed. Should you come close to one of them, you’re rushed away; you scum. But who is scum? Them or you? Whose life have you deliberately, and knowingly, harmed for money: or any other excuse? The ordinary man, and woman, in the street, crate the money that they covet for themselves. Your only importance is to be used to generate money, for them. Often working under poor; and, or unhealthy conditions. If you don’t do it, you will starve. They will see to it. If you speak, they will destroy your life without conscience. They appear to have reached a level of conceit, that they believe themselves to be above reproach. But that’s what absolute power does. It commits every crime in the book; hides behind the money, and remains safe. How much longer will such safety serve them, when the people wake up. Or will we wake up, perhaps too late. Let someone else do it; and we will just sit back, get the benefits if any; and complain. Think about it,

bob crosbie

voting day

As the governments put people under pressure, and as they do, they also learn new tricks. They learn how to walk that tight line, to manipulate and trick the various populations. When, and they will cross the line causing revolution, but not till they feel, that they can win, and supress the people: leaving us helpless They pass new statutes; and call them laws: but they are not laws, nor are they always lawful; and often contradictory.

Very often, they are unlawful to the level of being criminal. It becomes more obvious every day, but who is taking any notice. You either know it: not know it: or don’t want to know it, but you must by this late hour, aware within whatever state you live in. People are being carried off in handcuffs, for demonstrating. as seen on R.T.T.V this Am 2/2/16: All this for just lawfully trying to maintain the ownership of their homes and land. It’s happening everywhere: and the nets are tightening. Now we have two choices; they are either revolution against government abuses, or wait. The longer you wait, the tighter their grip; and the less chance of winning.

Some yeas ago the Pilgrims Society, headed by Queen Elizabeth II, decided to reduce the world population by 75% or close to it. So off went Blair and bush, and started the Iraqi war. They appeared to have simply got it wrong. Or did they? We now have half the world at war over religion; and we all know the best way to start a war, is to place two religions together in the same place, and sit back. Many of you will have wondered why they are making such a mess of handling the middle eastern wars, and now they are becoming more localized. Why leave the Saudi government in power? There has been plenty of reason, time, and opportunity to remove them. Why eliminate others, not half as bad as them. Their President is a trouble maker; who doesn’t care about his people, but he fits their needs.

All our assets are being sold off to privately owned corporations: and politicians are getting rich on the proceeds. We all know that politicians are all liars; and tell you whatever they want you to believe. Not actually know: but believe. So they use religion to ensure that you carry on thinking that what you only believe has some great value. Well it has, to them, but not to you. When you vote; draw a line down, and through all the candidates’ names, and write below it “NONE OF THESE”. To not vote, allows them to assume, that they have your mandate. When you do this and photograph the form, after drawing your line, or arrow; they cannot claim your mandate. The trickery they indulge in, in order to con: need to be neutralized. So this is the way to go. Use their own tricks against them. But remember that they have the police, army, and control over all the money. They also decide what is legal and what is not, but the law takes precedent; and no one in practice, can change it. Unless we let them.

All the time you hear about what the people believe in. Why? Why not what he people actually know. The problem: and the greatest weapon against you, is lack of fact. Facts, that you’re not allowed to know. After all who controls education, media etc. You, the state, or the church; and who controls them and I such manner us? The bankers do; and they are all privately owned, limited liability corporations. They take no responsibility through liability law for their actions, as they have shown here in Ireland. Voting time is here, so don’t forget. If you don’t vote; your mandate will be assumed. If you use the “None of these” you can tell them to go to hell; and there is little they can do about it, apart from lock us up; and they can’t lock us all up. We are a country with a government. They see it the other way round: as a government with a country. You will soon own nothing, not even yourself. It’s possible that it’s already gone too far; and don’t forget who owns the government. Not you; but the bankers. So either get off your backside, and help, or suffer the consequences. We will be reduced to a nation of slaves. Think about it. Believe or don’t believe,
bob crosbie